Managing Subrogated Claims in Personal Injury Actions and Subrogation Checklist

Author(s): Sloan H. Mandel, Deanna S. Gilbert

April 3, 2013


Black’s Law Dictionary defines subrogation as: “The substitution of one party for another whose debt the party pays, entitling the paying party to rights, remedies, or securities that would otherwise belong to the debtor.”1 In simpler terms, it is the right to reimbursement.

In the context of a personal injury case, subrogation is the process by which the Plaintiff advances claims to recover the cost of benefits or services that were provided or will be provided to her by a third party (the “subrogating entity”) as a result of her injuries. The right to subrogate (i.e. to be reimbursed) arises by virtue of contract or statute. Although the subrogating entity is not named as a Plaintiff in the lawsuit, its claims essentially “piggy back” onto those claims advanced personally by the Plaintiff. When the Plaintiff recovers the value of the subrogated claim from the Defendant, the money flows through the Plaintiff to the subrogating entity. In regards to past subrogated claims, as with other claims for past losses, pre-judgment interest applies.

The importance of understanding subrogated claims cannot be understated, especially since it is possible for these claims to reach hundreds of thousands dollars. The failure to advance a subrogated claim can have serious consequences for the Plaintiff, personally, and for Plaintiff’s counsel. The purpose of this paper will be to canvass some of the key considerations for Plaintiff’s counsel in the management of subrogated claims.

View PDF of paper: Managing Subrogated Claims in Personal Injury Actions

In addition to the paper is a Subrogation Checklist that ought to provide a quick-glace summary of the key considerations of which Plaintiff’s counsel ought to be mindful in order to successfully protect the client and properly advance a subrogated claim.

Share this


Related articles:

Mandatory Car Accident Benefits to be Reduced Once Again

Mandatory Car Accident Benefits To Be Reduced Once Again

Read more
Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold"

Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold”

Read more
Ontario Court Certifies Multiple Class Proceedings Against Long-Term Care Owners And Operators For Gross Negligence

Ontario Court Certifies Multiple Class Proceedings Against Long-Term Care Owners And Operators For Gross Negligence

Read more
Mandatory Car Accident Benefits to be Reduced Once Again

Mandatory Car Accident Benefits To Be Reduced Once Again

Read more
Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold"

Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold”

Read more
Ontario Court Certifies Multiple Class Proceedings Against Long-Term Care Owners And Operators For Gross Negligence

Ontario Court Certifies Multiple Class Proceedings Against Long-Term Care Owners And Operators For Gross Negligence

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now