Publication

Personal Injury Law: Getahun provided crucial clarity on consultations between experts, counsel

Author(s): Darcy R. Merkur

February 2, 2015

LawTimesNews.com | February 2, 2015 – There’s absolutely nothing improper with counsel’s practice of reviewing draft expert reports, according to the Ontario Court of Appeal in its hotly anticipated decision in Moore v. Getahun.

See the full article here.

Share this

Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to LinkedIn Share by Email

Related articles:

Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert
Firm news

Thomson Rogers Medical Malpractice Team Secures an $8.5 Million Judgment and a $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
TR Law Big Win Blue Cross
Firm news

Thomson Rogers Legal Team Secures Largest Known Punitive Damages Jury Award in an LTD Claim on Record

Read more
A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes
Trust Claim Standing

A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes

Read more
Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert
Firm news

Thomson Rogers Medical Malpractice Team Secures an $8.5 Million Judgment and a $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
TR Law Big Win Blue Cross
Firm news

Thomson Rogers Legal Team Secures Largest Known Punitive Damages Jury Award in an LTD Claim on Record

Read more
A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes
Trust Claim Standing

A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now