Personal Injury Law: Getahun provided crucial clarity on consultations between experts, counsel

Author(s): Darcy R. Merkur

February 2, 2015


LawTimesNews.com | February 2, 2015 – There’s absolutely nothing improper with counsel’s practice of reviewing draft expert reports, according to the Ontario Court of Appeal in its hotly anticipated decision in Moore v. Getahun.

See the full article here.

Share this


Related articles:

Concussion Confusion: Understanding Proper Diagnosis and the Risks of Misdiagnosis

Read more

Important Information For Motorcyclists And Their Passengers

Read more

Concussion Confusion: Understanding Proper Diagnosis and the Risks of Misdiagnosis

Read more

Important Information For Motorcyclists And Their Passengers

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now