Personal Injury Law: Getahun provided crucial clarity on consultations between experts, counsel

Author(s): Darcy R. Merkur

February 2, 2015


LawTimesNews.com | February 2, 2015 – There’s absolutely nothing improper with counsel’s practice of reviewing draft expert reports, according to the Ontario Court of Appeal in its hotly anticipated decision in Moore v. Getahun.

See the full article here.

Share this


Related articles:

Mandatory Car Accident Benefits to be Reduced Once Again

Mandatory Car Accident Benefits To Be Reduced Once Again

Read more
Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold"

Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold”

Read more
Ontario Court Certifies Multiple Class Proceedings Against Long-Term Care Owners And Operators For Gross Negligence

Ontario Court Certifies Multiple Class Proceedings Against Long-Term Care Owners And Operators For Gross Negligence

Read more
Mandatory Car Accident Benefits to be Reduced Once Again

Mandatory Car Accident Benefits To Be Reduced Once Again

Read more
Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold"

Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold”

Read more
Ontario Court Certifies Multiple Class Proceedings Against Long-Term Care Owners And Operators For Gross Negligence

Ontario Court Certifies Multiple Class Proceedings Against Long-Term Care Owners And Operators For Gross Negligence

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now