Owners’ Liability Triggered by Consent to Possession Rather Than Consent to the Operation of the Vehicle

Author(s): Stacey L. Stevens, L. Craig Brown

November 1, 2015


In a rare move the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned its previous decision in the 1955 case of Newman v. Terdik firmly closing the door on an automobile insurer’s ability to deny liability coverage to its insured when a negligent driver operates their vehicle in a manner prohibited by the owner.

Read full article

Share this


Related articles:

Thomson Rogers Named One oOf Canada’s Top 10 Personal Injury Law Firms by Canadian Lawyer Magazine

Thomson Rogers Named One Of Canada’s Top 10 Personal Injury Law Firms by Canadian Lawyer Magazine

Read more
2023AOE

Nominations Now Open For The 2023 Awards Of Excellence In Brain Injury Rehabilitation

Read more
Your Child Has Cerebral Palsy: Was it Medical Malpractice?

Your Child Has Cerebral Palsy: Was It Medical Malpractice?

Read more
Is It Too Late To Pursue My Legal Rights After A Serious Car Accident?

It’s Been Nearly Two Years Since A Serious Car Accident, Can I Pursue My Legal Rights?

Read more
Thomson Rogers Named One oOf Canada’s Top 10 Personal Injury Law Firms by Canadian Lawyer Magazine

Thomson Rogers Named One Of Canada’s Top 10 Personal Injury Law Firms by Canadian Lawyer Magazine

Read more
2023AOE

Nominations Now Open For The 2023 Awards Of Excellence In Brain Injury Rehabilitation

Read more
Your Child Has Cerebral Palsy: Was it Medical Malpractice?

Your Child Has Cerebral Palsy: Was It Medical Malpractice?

Read more
Is It Too Late To Pursue My Legal Rights After A Serious Car Accident?

It’s Been Nearly Two Years Since A Serious Car Accident, Can I Pursue My Legal Rights?

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now