Getting Schooled

Author(s): Carr Hatch

October 1, 2012


An Ontario court recently ruled that insurers owe a duty of care to their customers since customers would reasonably be expected to rely on information communicated to them by their insurer.

The issue of optional auto insurance benefits under Ontario’s revised Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (SABS) is front and centre in the 2012 decision, Zefferino v. Meloche Monnex Insurance Company.

Legislative amendments adopted by the Ontario government for individuals injured in car accidents on or after September 1, 2010, resulted in significant reductions to accident benefits to which those individuals are entitled.

Read full article: Getting Schooled by Carr Hatch.

Share this


Related articles:

Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Secures Important Victory in Denman v. Radovanovic Appeal: Court of Appeal Upholds $8.5 Million Informed Consent Verdict and $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
Mandatory Car Accident Benefits to be Reduced Once Again

Mandatory Car Accident Benefits To Be Reduced Once Again

Read more
Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold"

Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold”

Read more
Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Secures Important Victory in Denman v. Radovanovic Appeal: Court of Appeal Upholds $8.5 Million Informed Consent Verdict and $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
Mandatory Car Accident Benefits to be Reduced Once Again

Mandatory Car Accident Benefits To Be Reduced Once Again

Read more
Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold"

Simplifying Motor Vehicle Litigation by Eliminating the “Threshold”

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now