Drawing the line on what’s owed to a care provider

Author(s): Darcy R. Merkur

September 5, 2012


The extent of one’s “economic loss” has been determined to be irrelevant to an evaluation of the quantum available to a care provider who otherwise can meet the definition of “incurred” within the Ontario Statutory Accident Benefit Schedule (SABS).

See the full article here.

Share this


Related articles:

Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Medical Malpractice Team Secures an $8.5 Million Judgment and a $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
TR Law Big Win Blue Cross

Thomson Rogers Legal Team Secures Largest Known Punitive Damages Jury Award in an LTD Claim on Record

Read more
A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes

A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes

Read more
Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Medical Malpractice Team Secures an $8.5 Million Judgment and a $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
TR Law Big Win Blue Cross

Thomson Rogers Legal Team Secures Largest Known Punitive Damages Jury Award in an LTD Claim on Record

Read more
A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes

A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now