The incurred expenses debate

Author(s): Stacey L. Stevens

March 25, 2013


Since the Sept. 1, 2010 re-introduction of the concept of “incurred” expenses and the qualifying term “economic loss” in the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule, automobile insurers and accident victims have debated how the terms incurred and economic loss should be applied when paying for allowable goods or services, Toronto personal injury lawyer Stacey L. Stevens writes in Lawyers Weekly.

“The debate is even more pronounced when the person providing the goods or services is a non-professional or family member of the accident victim,” she writes.

Read more…

Share this


Related articles:

TR Law

Toronto Councillors Mark Grimes, Justin Di Ciano Charged Under Municipal Elections Act

Read more
TR Law

Hundreds of so-called ‘trespassers’ have been run over on Canada’s railways. The Transportation Safety Board has only investigate two

Read more
TR Law

Toronto Councillors Mark Grimes, Justin Di Ciano Charged Under Municipal Elections Act

Read more
TR Law

Hundreds of so-called ‘trespassers’ have been run over on Canada’s railways. The Transportation Safety Board has only investigate two

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now