Court of Appeal Confirms Insured is Not Limited to 1 Application for Catastrophic Impairment

June 14, 2011


The Ontario Court of Appeal recently confirmed an insured’s right to re-apply for catastrophic impairment where there has been a material change in circumstances. In 2003, Co-Operators denied the insured’s application for catastrophic impairment. The denial was not disputed within the 2 year limitation period set out in section 40(4) of the SABS. Six years later, the insured re-applied for catastrophic impairment. Co-Operators rejected the 2nd application on the basis of the 2003 denial and the insured’s failure to dispute same. On appeal, Co-operators conceded an insured’s right to re-apply under another catastrophic criteria but argued she was barred from re-applying under the same category relied upon in the 2003 determination. The Court unanimously rejected Co-Operator’s position and concluded that to deny an insured’s right to re-apply for catastrophic impairment where that person’s injuries become catastrophic over time would result in unfairness.

Share this


Related articles:

Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Secures Important Victory in Denman v. Radovanovic Appeal: Court of Appeal Upholds $8.5 Million Informed Consent Verdict and $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
Baker v. Blue Cross –The Ontario Court Of Appeal Upholds The Largest Known Punitive Damages Award Against A Disability Insurance Company In Canada

Baker v. Blue Cross –The Ontario Court Of Appeal Upholds The Largest Known Punitive Damages Award Against A Disability Insurance Company In Canada

Read more
Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Medical Malpractice Team Secures an $8.5 Million Judgment and a $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Secures Important Victory in Denman v. Radovanovic Appeal: Court of Appeal Upholds $8.5 Million Informed Consent Verdict and $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
Baker v. Blue Cross –The Ontario Court Of Appeal Upholds The Largest Known Punitive Damages Award Against A Disability Insurance Company In Canada

Baker v. Blue Cross –The Ontario Court Of Appeal Upholds The Largest Known Punitive Damages Award Against A Disability Insurance Company In Canada

Read more
Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Medical Malpractice Team Secures an $8.5 Million Judgment and a $3 Million Cost Award

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now