Court of Appeal Confirms Insured is Not Limited to 1 Application for Catastrophic Impairment

June 14, 2011


The Ontario Court of Appeal recently confirmed an insured’s right to re-apply for catastrophic impairment where there has been a material change in circumstances. In 2003, Co-Operators denied the insured’s application for catastrophic impairment. The denial was not disputed within the 2 year limitation period set out in section 40(4) of the SABS. Six years later, the insured re-applied for catastrophic impairment. Co-Operators rejected the 2nd application on the basis of the 2003 denial and the insured’s failure to dispute same. On appeal, Co-operators conceded an insured’s right to re-apply under another catastrophic criteria but argued she was barred from re-applying under the same category relied upon in the 2003 determination. The Court unanimously rejected Co-Operator’s position and concluded that to deny an insured’s right to re-apply for catastrophic impairment where that person’s injuries become catastrophic over time would result in unfairness.

Share this


Related articles:

Landmark Trial Decision – Ontario Superior Court Rules In Favour of PS752 Victims

Read more
Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Secures Important Victory in Denman v. Radovanovic Appeal: Court of Appeal Upholds $8.5 Million Informed Consent Verdict and $3 Million Cost Award

Read more

Landmark Trial Decision – Ontario Superior Court Rules In Favour of PS752 Victims

Read more
Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert

Thomson Rogers Secures Important Victory in Denman v. Radovanovic Appeal: Court of Appeal Upholds $8.5 Million Informed Consent Verdict and $3 Million Cost Award

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers LLP as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now