Publication

Cost proportionality not always kind to injured plaintiffs

Author(s): Darcy R. Merkur

June 9, 2014

When it comes to legal costs, the proportionality concept is a welcome feature in civil litigation but it can serve to penalize personal injury plaintiffs with modest claims.

See the full article here.

Share this

Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to LinkedIn Share by Email

Related articles:

Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert
Firm news

Thomson Rogers Medical Malpractice Team Secures an $8.5 Million Judgment and a $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
TR Law Big Win Blue Cross
Firm news

Thomson Rogers Legal Team Secures Largest Known Punitive Damages Jury Award in an LTD Claim on Record

Read more
A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes
Trust Claim Standing

A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes

Read more
Sloan H. Mandel, Alex Mladenovic, Deana S. Gilbert
Firm news

Thomson Rogers Medical Malpractice Team Secures an $8.5 Million Judgment and a $3 Million Cost Award

Read more
TR Law Big Win Blue Cross
Firm news

Thomson Rogers Legal Team Secures Largest Known Punitive Damages Jury Award in an LTD Claim on Record

Read more
A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes
Trust Claim Standing

A Non-Titled Spouse Does Not Have Standing To Advance A Trust Claim On Behalf Of The Other Spouse For Equalization Purposes

Read more

Stay Informed

Subscribe to receive updates on the latest news from Thomson Rogers as well as invitations to seminars, webinars and more.

Sign up now